Denmark Breaks with Tradition: Double Bridles Banned by Danish Equestrian Federation

In a bold move that is sparking debate across the international dressage community, the Danish Equestrian Federation (DRF) has announced a national ban on the use of double bridles in competition for all youth riders under the age of 21. This landmark decision reflects a growing global shift toward prioritising horse welfare and ethical training practices in equestrian sport.

A Move Toward Welfare-First Riding

Double bridles—comprising both a snaffle and a curb bit—have long been a hallmark of advanced dressage, used to refine communication between horse and rider. But they’ve also been at the centre of controversy, with critics arguing that, in the wrong hands, the combination can cause discomfort, confusion, and even long-term damage to the horse’s mouth.

By eliminating this requirement for young riders, the Danish Federation is sending a clear message: rider education, feel, and empathy must take precedence over traditional equipment standards. In practice, this means that children, juniors, young riders, and U25s will now compete exclusively in snaffle bridles at national level—removing both the physical and psychological pressure often associated with double bridle use.

Aligning With Evolving Standards

The move aligns with Denmark’s broader equestrian philosophy, which increasingly favours transparency, welfare, and sustainable development for horse and rider partnerships. The Federation has stated that the decision came after extensive consultation with trainers, veterinarians, and welfare experts, all of whom emphasised the importance of building solid foundations before introducing more complex gear.

Interestingly, Denmark is not alone in this shift. Several other European nations have introduced similar reforms at lower levels of the sport, and even the FEI has permitted snaffle bridles in international small tour competitions. However, Denmark is the first country to introduce a full double bridle ban for an entire youth division at national level.

Responses from the Riding Community

Reactions have been mixed but passionate. Many welfare advocates have praised the move as progressive and long overdue.

“This is a watershed moment for dressage,” says equine behaviourist and trainer Dr. Mia Rask. “Young riders should be developing soft, educated hands and a feel for the horse—not relying on leverage or force.”

Others, particularly traditionalists, have expressed concern that riders may be underprepared for international competition where double bridles are still standard for certain levels. Critics argue that riders may face a disadvantage when stepping onto the FEI stage.

Nevertheless, Danish team coaches remain confident that the focus on snaffle-based riding will produce more empathetic, technically proficient athletes over the long term.

What This Means Going Forward

This development reignites broader discussions about the future of dressage: Is it time to modernise the rulebook? Should national policies influence FEI standards? And how can the sport evolve without losing its identity?

What’s certain is that Denmark’s decision will have ripple effects far beyond its borders. As federations worldwide grapple with the evolving balance between tradition and welfare, this ban may be seen in hindsight as a pivotal turning point.

As the conversation continues, all eyes will be on Denmark’s youth riders—who may soon become the model for a kinder, more conscious era of dressage.

---